From c6c224a78715d5e2c532fe318325fbca8e70e701 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Karen Arutyunov Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 20:00:08 +0300 Subject: Add noexcept to move constructors and move assignment operators --- libbutl/small-vector.hxx | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'libbutl/small-vector.hxx') diff --git a/libbutl/small-vector.hxx b/libbutl/small-vector.hxx index 9e2a357..44a3ef5 100644 --- a/libbutl/small-vector.hxx +++ b/libbutl/small-vector.hxx @@ -4,8 +4,9 @@ #pragma once #include -#include // size_t -#include // move() +#include // size_t +#include // move() +#include // is_nothrow_move_constructible #include @@ -107,7 +108,25 @@ namespace butl return *this; } - small_vector (small_vector&& v) noexcept + // Note that while the move constructor is implemented via the move + // assignment it may not throw if the value type is no-throw move + // constructible. + // + // Specifically, if v.size() > N then allocators evaluate as equal and the + // buffer ownership is transferred. Otherwise, the allocators do not + // evaluate as equal and the individual elements are move-constructed in + // the preallocated buffer. + // + // Also note that this constructor ends up calling + // base_type::operator=(base_type&&) whose noexcept expression evaluates + // to false (propagate_on_container_move_assignment and is_always_equal + // are false for small_allocator; see std::vector documentation for + // details). We, however, assume that the noexcept expression we use here + // is strict enough for all "sane" std::vector implementations since + // small_allocator never throws directly. + // + small_vector (small_vector&& v) + noexcept (std::is_nothrow_move_constructible::value) : base_type (allocator_type (this)) { if (v.size () <= N) @@ -121,8 +140,14 @@ namespace butl v.clear (); } + // Note that when size() <= N and v.size() > N, then allocators of this + // and other containers do not evaluate as equal. Thus, the memory for the + // new elements is allocated on the heap and so std::bad_alloc can be + // thrown. @@ TODO: maybe we could re-implement this case in terms of + // swap()? + // small_vector& - operator= (small_vector&& v) + operator= (small_vector&& v) noexcept (false) { // VC's implementation of operator=(&&) (both 14 and 15) frees the // memory and then reallocated with capacity equal to v.size(). This is -- cgit v1.1