From 9920e41e1372229c52f74151af5f1570f32a489c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Boris Kolpackov Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 09:33:13 +0200 Subject: Cache "recipe is group_action" information, clear recipes after execution --- libbuild2/algorithm.cxx | 18 ++++++++++++------ libbuild2/algorithm.ixx | 7 +++++-- libbuild2/target.hxx | 1 + libbuild2/target.ixx | 11 +++++++---- 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) (limited to 'libbuild2') diff --git a/libbuild2/algorithm.cxx b/libbuild2/algorithm.cxx index 8ef88e4..287ab2e 100644 --- a/libbuild2/algorithm.cxx +++ b/libbuild2/algorithm.cxx @@ -1914,14 +1914,20 @@ namespace build2 ts = s.state = target_state::failed; } + // Clear the recipe to release any associated memory. Note that + // s.recipe_group_action may be used further (see, for example, + // group_state()) and should retain its value. + // + // + s.recipe = nullptr; + // Decrement the target count (see set_recipe() for details). // - if (a.inner ()) - { - recipe_function** f (s.recipe.target ()); - if (f == nullptr || *f != &group_action) - ctx.target_count.fetch_sub (1, memory_order_relaxed); - } + // Note that here we cannot rely on s.state being group because of the + // postponment logic (see excute_recipe() for details). + // + if (a.inner () && !s.recipe_group_action) + ctx.target_count.fetch_sub (1, memory_order_relaxed); // Decrement the task count (to count_executed) and wake up any threads // that might be waiting for this target. diff --git a/libbuild2/algorithm.ixx b/libbuild2/algorithm.ixx index ce1ebee..02c430b 100644 --- a/libbuild2/algorithm.ixx +++ b/libbuild2/algorithm.ixx @@ -506,6 +506,7 @@ namespace build2 target::opstate& s (t[l.action]); s.recipe = move (r); + s.recipe_group_action = false; // If this is a noop recipe, then mark the target unchanged to allow for // some optimizations. @@ -531,9 +532,11 @@ namespace build2 // likely. The alternative (trying to "merge" the count keeping track of // whether inner and/or outer is noop) gets hairy rather quickly. // - if (l.action.inner ()) + if (f != nullptr && *f == &group_action) + s.recipe_group_action = true; + else { - if (f == nullptr || *f != &group_action) + if (l.action.inner ()) t.ctx.target_count.fetch_add (1, memory_order_relaxed); } } diff --git a/libbuild2/target.hxx b/libbuild2/target.hxx index 696d5d0..f652347 100644 --- a/libbuild2/target.hxx +++ b/libbuild2/target.hxx @@ -626,6 +626,7 @@ namespace build2 // Applied recipe. // build2::recipe recipe; + bool recipe_group_action; // Recipe is group_action. // Target state for this operation. Note that it is undetermined until // a rule is matched and recipe applied (see set_recipe()). diff --git a/libbuild2/target.ixx b/libbuild2/target.ixx index 79cc07c..bdfa20f 100644 --- a/libbuild2/target.ixx +++ b/libbuild2/target.ixx @@ -268,16 +268,19 @@ namespace build2 // raw state is not group provided the recipe is group_recipe and the // state is unknown (see mtime() for a discussion on why we do it). // + // Note that additionally s.state may not be target_state::group even + // after execution due to deferment (see execute_impl() for details). + // + // @@ Hm, I wonder why not just return s.recipe_group_action now that we + // cache it. + // const opstate& s (state[a]); if (s.state == target_state::group) return true; if (s.state == target_state::unknown && group != nullptr) - { - if (recipe_function* const* f = s.recipe.target ()) - return *f == &group_action; - } + return s.recipe_group_action; return false; } -- cgit v1.1