diff options
author | Boris Kolpackov <boris@codesynthesis.com> | 2018-09-07 09:10:58 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Boris Kolpackov <boris@codesynthesis.com> | 2018-09-07 09:10:58 +0200 |
commit | 990a04587fecbce2b1fbde65a22f46e6fa0afb07 (patch) | |
tree | 443259720c9a3885889919358829aeb6b7b84b8e /doc | |
parent | 0d275db1433dec9bc7b4fcf5fcd28b42da3b6166 (diff) |
Explain subprojects and amalgamation in manual
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/manual.cli | 250 |
1 files changed, 245 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/doc/manual.cli b/doc/manual.cli index 40365d7..c11f030 100644 --- a/doc/manual.cli +++ b/doc/manual.cli @@ -17,10 +17,6 @@ /* @@ include includes once (also source) -- amalgamation (I think leave to its section, maybe mention and ref in search - order) -- create: as common configuration? - @@ info (where? in scopes? could show some? separate section?) @@ other meta-ops: create (anything else?) @@ -30,6 +26,7 @@ projects. @@ establish a chapter for each module +@@ module synopsis idea */ " @@ -2633,7 +2630,250 @@ details). \h#intro-subproj|Subprojects and Amalgamations| -@@ TODO +In \c{build2} projects can contain other projects, recursively. In this +arrangement the outer project is called an \i{amalgamation} and the inner \- +\i{subprojects}. In contrast to importation where we merely reference a +project somewhere else, amalgamation is physical containment. It can be +\i{strong} where the src directory of a subproject is within the amalgamating +project or \i{weak} where only the out directory is contained. + +There are several distinct use cases for amalgamations. We've already +discussed the \c{tests/} subproject in \c{libhello}. To recap, traditionally +it is made a subproject rather than a subdirectory to support building it as a +standalone project in order to test the library installation. + +As discussed in \l{#intro-import Target Importation}, subprojects and +amalgamations (as well as their subprojects, recursively) are automatically +considered when resolving imports. As a result, amalgamation can be used to +\i{bundle} our dependencies to produce an external dependency-free +distribution. For example, if our \c{hello} project imports \c{libhello}, then +we could copy the \c{libhello} project inside \c{hello}, for example: + +\ +$ tree hello/ +hello/ +├── build/ +│ └── ... +├── hello/ +│ ├── hello.cxx +│ └── ... +├── libhello/ +│ ├── build/ +│ │ └── ... +│ ├── libhello/ +│ │ ├── hello.hxx +│ │ ├── hello.cxx +│ │ └── ... +│ ├── tests/ +│ │ └── ... +│ └── buildfile +└── buildfile + +$ b hello/ +c++ hello/libhello/libhello/cxx{hello} +ld hello/libhello/libhello/libs{hello} +c++ hello/hello/cxx{hello} +ld hello/hello/exe{hello} +\ + +Note, however, that while project bundling can be useful in certain cases, it +does not scale as a general dependency management solution. For that packaging +and \l{bpkg(1)}, the \c{build2} package dependency manager, are the +appropriate mechanisms. + +\N|By default \c{build2} looks for subprojects only in the root directory of a +project. That is, every root subdirectory is examined to be a project root. If +you need to place a subproject somewhere else in your project's directory +hierarchy, then you will need to specify its location (and of all other +subprojects) explicitly with the \c{subprojects} variable in +\c{bootstrap.build}. For example, if above we placed \c{libhello} into the +\c{extras/} subdirectory of \c{hello}, then our \c{bootstrap.build} would +need to start like this: + +\ +project = hello +subprojects = extras/libhello/ +... +\ + +Note also that while importation of specific targets from subprojects is +always performed, whether they are loaded and built as part of the overall +project build is controlled using the standard subdirectories inclusion +and dependency. Continue with the above example, if we adjust the root +\c{buildfile} in \c{hello} project to exclude the \c{extras/} subdirectory +from the build: + +\ +./: {*/ -build/ -extras/} +\ + +Then while we can still import \c{libhello} from any \c{buildfile} in our +project, the entire \c{libhello} (for example, its tests) will never be built +as part of the \c{hello} build. + +Similar to subprojects we can also explicitly specify the project's +amalgamation with the \c{amalgamation} variable (again, in +\c{bootstrap.build}). This is rarely necessary except if you want to prevent +the project from being amalgamated, in which case you should set it to the +empty value. + +If either of these variables is not explicitly set, then it will contain +the automatically discovered value.| + +Besides affecting importation, another important property of amalgamation is +configuration inheritance. As an example, let's configure the above bundled +\c{hello} project in the src directory: + +\ +$ b configure: hello/ config.cxx=clang++ config.cxx.coptions=-d + +$ b tree +hello/ +├── build/ +│ ├── config.build +│ └── ... +├── libhello/ +│ ├── build/ +│ │ ├── config.build +│ │ └── ... +│ └── ... +└── ... +\ + +As you can see, we now have the \c{config.build} files in both project's +\c{build/} subdirectories. If we examine the amalgamation's \c{config.build}, +we will see the familiar picture: + +\ +$ cat hello/build/config.build + +config.cxx = clang++ +config.cxx.poptions = [null] +config.cxx.coptions = -d +config.cxx.loptions = [null] +config.cxx.libs = [null] + +... + +\ + +The subproject's \c{config.build}, however, is pretty much empty: + +\ +$ cat hello/libhello/build/config.build + +# Base configuration inherited from ../ +\ + +As the comment suggests, the base configuration is inherited from the outer +project. We can, however, override some values if we need to. For example +(note that we are re-configuring the \c{libhello} subproject): + +\ +$ b configure: hello/libhello/ config.cxx.coptions+=-O2 + +$ cat hello/libhello/build/config.build + +# Base configuration inherited from ../ + +config.cxx.coptions = -O2 +\ + +This configuration inheritance combined with import resolution is behind the +most common use of amalgamations in \c{build2} \- shared build +configurations. Let's say we are developing multiple projects, for example, +\c{libhello} and \c{hello} that imports it: + +\ +$ ls -1 +hello/ +libhello/ +\ + +And we want to build them with several compilers, let's say GCC and Clang. As +we have already seen in \l{#intro-operations-config Configuration}, we can +configure several out of source builds for each of them, for example: + +\ +$ b configure: libhello/@libhello-gcc/ config.cxx=g++ +$ b configure: libhello/@libhello-clang/ config.cxx=clang++ + +$ b configure: hello/@hello-gcc/ \ + config.cxx=g++ \ + config.import.libhello=libhello-gcc/ +$ b configure: hello/@hello-clang/ \ + config.cxx=clang++ \ + config.import.libhello=libhello-clang/ + +$ ls -l +hello/ +hello-gcc/ +hello-clang/ +libhello/ +libhello-gcc/ +libhello-clang/ +\ + +Needless to say, a lot of repetitive typing. Another problem is changes to the +configurations. If, for example, we need to adjust compile options in the GCC +configuration we will have to (remember to) do it in multiple places. + +You can probably sense where this is going: why not create a shared build +configuration (that is, an amalgamation) for GCC and Clang where we build both +of our projects (as its subprojects). This is how we can do that: + +\ +$ b create: build-gcc/,cc config.cxx=g++ +$ b create: build-clang/,cc config.cxx=clang++ + +$ b configure: libhello/@build-gcc/libhello/ +$ b configure: hello/@build-gcc/hello/ + +$ b configure: libhello/@build-clang/libhello/ +$ b configure: hello/@build-clang/hello/ + +$ ls -l +hello/ +libhello/ +build-gcc/ +build-clang/ +\ + +Let's explain what's going on here. First we create two build configurations +using the \c{create} meta-operation. These are real \c{build2} projects just +tailored for housing other projects as subprojects. After the directory name +we specify the list of modules to load in the project's \c{root.build}. In our +case we specify \c{cc} which is a common module for C-based languages (see +\l{b(1)} for details on \c{create} and its parameters). + +\N|When creating build configurations it is a good idea to get into the habit +of using the \c{cc} module instead of \c{c} or \c{cxx} since with more complex +dependency chains we may not know whether every project we build only uses C +or C++. In fact, it is not uncommon for C++ project to have C implementation +details and even the other way around (yes, really, there are C libraries with +a C++ implementation).| + +Once the configurations are ready we simply configure our \c{libhello} and +\c{hello} as subprojects in each of them. Note that now we neither need to +specify \c{config.cxx} since it will be inherited from the amalgamation nor +\c{config.import.*} since the import will be automatically resolved to a +subproject. + +Now to build a specific project in a particular configuration we simply build +the corresponding subdirectory. We can also build the entire build +configuration if we want to. For Example: + +\ +$ b build-gcc/hello/ + +$ b build-clang/ +\ + +\N|In case you've already looking into \l{bpkg(1)} and/or \l{bdep(1)}, their +build configurations are actually these same amalgamations (created underneath +with the \c{create} meta-operation) and their packages are just subprojects. +And with this understanding you are free to interact with them directly using +the build system interface.| \h#intro-lang|Buildfile Language| |