From b4ea7fc17b0b69ac21cf517120b88f76296d57a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Francois Kritzinger Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 15:03:10 +0200 Subject: Update comments --- mod/mod-ci-github-gh.cxx | 3 +- mod/mod-ci-github-gq.hxx | 15 ++++-- mod/mod-ci-github.cxx | 136 +++++++++-------------------------------------- 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-) (limited to 'mod') diff --git a/mod/mod-ci-github-gh.cxx b/mod/mod-ci-github-gh.cxx index dcea563..5199eea 100644 --- a/mod/mod-ci-github-gh.cxx +++ b/mod/mod-ci-github-gh.cxx @@ -7,8 +7,7 @@ namespace brep { - // Return the GitHub check run status corresponding to a build_state. Throw - // invalid_argument if the build_state value was invalid. + // Return the GitHub check run status corresponding to a build_state. // string gh_to_status (build_state st) diff --git a/mod/mod-ci-github-gq.hxx b/mod/mod-ci-github-gq.hxx index 72283ee..3083696 100644 --- a/mod/mod-ci-github-gq.hxx +++ b/mod/mod-ci-github-gq.hxx @@ -26,6 +26,11 @@ namespace brep // Note: no details_url yet since there will be no entry in the build result // search page until the task starts building. // + // Note that creating a check_run named `foo` will effectively replace any + // existing check_runs with that name. They will still exist on the GitHub + // servers but GitHub will only consider the latest one (for display in the + // UI or in determining the mergeability of a PR). + // bool gq_create_check_runs (const basic_mark& error, vector& check_runs, @@ -86,7 +91,7 @@ namespace brep // Fetch pre-check information for a pull request from GitHub. This // information is used to decide whether or not to CI the PR and is // comprised of the PR's head commit SHA, whether its head branch is behind - // its base branch, and its test merge commit SHA. + // its base branch, and its mergeability and test merge commit SHA. // // Return absent value if the merge commit is still being generated (which // means PR head branch behindness is not yet known either). See the @@ -97,8 +102,12 @@ namespace brep // will be treated by the caller as still being generated). // // Note that the first request causes GitHub to start preparing the test - // merge commit. (For details see - // https://docs.github.com/rest/guides/getting-started-with-the-git-database-api#checking-mergeability-of-pull-requests.) + // merge commit. + // + // For details regarding the test merge commit and how to check/poll for PR + // mergeability see + // https://docs.github.com/en/rest/pulls/pulls?#get-a-pull-request and + // https://docs.github.com/en/rest/guides/using-the-rest-api-to-interact-with-your-git-database?#checking-mergeability-of-pull-requests // struct gq_pr_pre_check_info { diff --git a/mod/mod-ci-github.cxx b/mod/mod-ci-github.cxx index 60a6bae..035d81b 100644 --- a/mod/mod-ci-github.cxx +++ b/mod/mod-ci-github.cxx @@ -585,120 +585,25 @@ namespace brep return true; } - // High-level description of pull request (PR) handling + // Miscellaneous pull request facts // - // @@ TODO Update these comments. + // - Although some of the GitHub documentation makes it sound like they + // expect check runs to be added to both the PR head commit and the merge + // commit, the PR UI does not react to the merge commit's check runs + // consistently. It actually seems to be quite broken. The only thing it + // does seem to do reliably is blocking the PR merge if the merge commit's + // check runs are not successful (i.e, overriding the PR head commit's + // check runs). But the UI looks quite messed up generally in this state. // - // - Some GitHub pull request terminology: + // - When new commits are added to a PR base branch, pull_request.base.sha + // does not change, but the test merge commit will be updated to include + // the new commits to the base branch. // - // - Fork and pull model: Pull requests are created in a forked - // repository. Thus the head and base repositories are different. + // - When new commits are added to a PR head branch, pull_request.head.sha + // gets updated with the head commit's SHA and check_suite.pull_requests[] + // will contain all PRs with this branch as head. // - // - Shared repository model: The pull request head and base branches are - // in the same repository. For example, from a feature branch onto - // master. - // - // - CI the merge commit but add check runs to the pull request head commit - // - // Most of the major CI integrations build the merge commit instead of the - // PR head commit. - // - // Adding the check runs to the PR head commit is recommended by the - // following blog posts by a GitHub employee who is one of the best - // sources on these topics: - // https://www.kenmuse.com/blog/shared-commits-and-github-checks/ and - // https://www.kenmuse.com/blog/creating-github-checks/. - // - // Do not add any check runs to the merge commit because: - // - // - The PR head commit is the only commit that can be relied upon to - // exist throughout the PR's lifetime. The merge commit, on the other - // hand, can change during the PR process. When that happens the PR will - // look for check runs on the new merge commit, effectively discarding - // the ones we had before. - // - // - Although some of the GitHub documentation makes it sound like they - // expect check runs to be added to both the PR head commit and the - // merge commit, the PR UI does not react to the merge commit's check - // runs consistently. It actually seems to be quite broken. - // - // The only thing it seems to do reliably is blocking the PR merge if - // the merge commit's check runs are not successful (i.e, overriding the - // PR head commit's check runs). But the UI looks quite messed up - // generally in this state. - // - // Note that, in the case of a PR from a forked repository (the so-called - // "fork and pull" model), GitHub will copy the PR head commit from the - // head repository (the forked one) into the base repository. So the check - // runs must always be added to the base repository, whether the PR is - // from within the same repository or from a forked repository. The merge - // and head commits will be at refs/pull//{merge,head}. - // - // - @@ TODO Shared repo model problems - // - // The root of all of these problems is that, in the shared repository - // model, for every PR we also receive a check_suite for the commit to - // the head branch. The situation is exacerbated by the fact that the - // PR and CS can arrive in any order. - // - // - There will be two CIs running concurrently, building different - // commits: the head commit (check_suite) vs merge commit - // (pull_request). - // - // - The CS and PR check_runs will all be added to the same commit - // SHA: pull_request.head.sha, check_suite.head_sha (see above for - // the reasons we don't put the check_runs on the merge - // commit). - // - // - Recall that creating a check_run named `A` will effectively - // replace any existing check_runs with that name. They will still - // exist on the GitHub servers but GitHub will only consider the - // latest one (for display in the UI or in determining the - // mergeability of a PR). - // - // - Some CS CRs may finish after the corresponding PR CRs, thus - // potentially inverting the true status of a PR (e.g., allow the - // merge of a PR with a bad merge commit). - // - // Thus we need a way to prevent any CS check_runs from being updated - // after having received a PR. - // - // Problem 1: Create PR from feature branch - // - // - Receive check_suite for commit to feature branch - // - Receive pull_request - // - // Solution: When receive a PR, fetch all check_suites with that head - // SHA (curl REPO/commits/SHA/check-suites) and cancel their CI - // jobs. - // - // Thus there will be no more CS check_run updates. Note however that in - // most cases the PR will be received long enough after the CS for the - // latter's check_runs to all have completed already. - // - // Note that there will not be a merge CR on the head yet so the PR will - // never be green. - // - // Problem 2: New commits are added to PR head branch - // - // Note: The check_suite and pull_request can arrive in any order. - // - // - check_suite(requested, PR_head) - // - // Note: check_suite.pull_requests[] will contain all PRs with this - // branch as head. - // - // Note: check_suite.pull_requests[i].head.sha will be the new, - // updated PR head sha. - // - // - pull_request(synchronize) - // - // Solution: Ignore all check_suites with non-empty pull_requests[]. - // - // - New commits are added to PR base branch - // - // Note: In this case pull_request.base.sha does not change, but the merge - // commit will be updated to include the new commits to the base branch. + // Remaining TODOs // // - @@ TODO? PR base branch changed (to a different branch) // @@ -769,6 +674,12 @@ namespace brep // Note that PR rebuilds (re-requested) are handled by check_suite(). // + // Note that, in the case of a remote PR, GitHub will copy the PR head + // commit from the head (forked) repository into the base repository. So + // the check runs must always be added to the base repository, whether the + // PR is local or remote. The head commit refs are located at + // refs/pull//head. + // service_data sd (warning_success, move (iat->token), iat->expires_at, @@ -900,7 +811,8 @@ namespace brep { // Create the CI tenant. - // Update service data's check_sha if this is a remote PR. + // Set the service data's check_sha if this is a remote PR. The test + // merge commit refs are located at refs/pull//merge. // if (sd.kind == service_data::remote) sd.check_sha = *pc->merge_commit_sha; @@ -1098,7 +1010,7 @@ namespace brep { string ru; // Repository URL. - // CI the merge test commit for remote PRs and the head commit for + // CI the test merge commit for remote PRs and the head commit for // everything else (branch push or local PRs). // if (sd.kind == service_data::remote) -- cgit v1.1