From ffab0e52df6609050f19f0cbd31b2f7d7d2daa1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Boris Kolpackov Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:44:02 +0200 Subject: Add extra diagnostics if argument doesn't look like package name/version --- bpkg/pkg-build.cxx | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/bpkg/pkg-build.cxx b/bpkg/pkg-build.cxx index 8026308..6202095 100644 --- a/bpkg/pkg-build.cxx +++ b/bpkg/pkg-build.cxx @@ -761,9 +761,18 @@ namespace bpkg shared_ptr root (db.load ("")); - while (args.more ()) + // Here is what happens here: are are going to try and guess whether we + // are dealing with a package archive, package directory, or package + // name/version by first trying it as an archive, then as a directory, + // and then assume it is name/version. Sometimes, however, it is really + // one of the first two but just broken. In this case things are really + // confusing since we suppress all diagnostics for the first two + // "guesses". So what we are going to do here is re-run them with full + // diagnostics if the name/version guess doesn't pan out. + // + for (bool diag (false); args.more (); ) { - const char* s (args.next ()); + const char* s (args.peek ()); // Reduce all the potential variations (archive, directory, package // name, package name/version) to a single available_package object. @@ -781,7 +790,11 @@ namespace bpkg path a (s); if (exists (a)) { - package_manifest m (pkg_verify (o, a, true, false)); + if (diag) + info << "'" << s << "' does not appear to be a valid package " + << "archive: "; + + package_manifest m (pkg_verify (o, a, true, diag)); // This is a package archive (note that we shouldn't throw // failed from here on). @@ -810,7 +823,11 @@ namespace bpkg dir_path d (s); if (exists (d)) { - package_manifest m (pkg_verify (d, true, false)); + if (diag) + info << "'" << s << "' does not appear to be a valid package " + << "directory: "; + + package_manifest m (pkg_verify (d, true, diag)); // This is a package directory (note that we shouldn't throw // failed from here on). @@ -832,25 +849,40 @@ namespace bpkg // Not a valid package archive. } + // If this was a diagnostics "run", then we are done. + // + if (diag) + throw failed (); + // Then it got to be a package name with optional version. // if (ap == nullptr) { - n = parse_package_name (s); - v = parse_package_version (s); - level4 ([&]{trace << "package " << n << "; version " << v;}); + try + { + n = parse_package_name (s); + v = parse_package_version (s); + level4 ([&]{trace << "package " << n << "; version " << v;}); - // Either get the user-specified version or the latest. - // - auto rp ( - v.empty () - ? find_available (db, n, root, nullopt) - : find_available (db, n, root, dependency_constraint (v))); + // Either get the user-specified version or the latest. + // + auto rp ( + v.empty () + ? find_available (db, n, root, nullopt) + : find_available (db, n, root, dependency_constraint (v))); - ap = rp.first; - ar = rp.second; + ap = rp.first; + ar = rp.second; + } + catch (const failed&) + { + diag = true; + continue; + } } + args.next (); // We are handling this argument. + // Load the package that may have already been selected and // figure out what exactly we need to do here. The end goal // is the available_package object corresponding to the actual -- cgit v1.1