aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/bpkg/package-configuration.cxx
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'bpkg/package-configuration.cxx')
-rw-r--r--bpkg/package-configuration.cxx24
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/bpkg/package-configuration.cxx b/bpkg/package-configuration.cxx
index 688d202..42c17ab 100644
--- a/bpkg/package-configuration.cxx
+++ b/bpkg/package-configuration.cxx
@@ -213,13 +213,13 @@ namespace bpkg
for (package_skeleton& depc: depcs)
{
- package_configuration& cfg (cfgs[depc.key]);
+ package_configuration& cfg (cfgs[depc.package]);
for (config_variable_value& v: cfg)
{
if (v.origin == variable_origin::buildfile)
{
- if (*v.dependent == dept.key)
+ if (*v.dependent == dept.package)
{
old_cfgs.push_back (
dependent_config_variable_value {
@@ -241,10 +241,10 @@ namespace bpkg
if (da.prefer)
fail << "unable to negotiate configuration for system dependency "
- << depc.key << " without configuration information" <<
+ << depc.package << " without configuration information" <<
info << "consider specifying system dependency version that has "
<< "corresponding available package" <<
- info << "dependent " << dept.key << " has prefer/accept clauses "
+ info << "dependent " << dept.package << " has prefer/accept clauses "
<< "that cannot be evaluated without configuration information";
if (!cfg.system)
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ namespace bpkg
// operator[] (which is really a push_back() into a vector).
//
for (package_skeleton& depc: depcs)
- depc_cfgs.push_back (cfgs[depc.key]);
+ depc_cfgs.push_back (cfgs[depc.package]);
// Step 2: execute the prefer/accept or requires clauses.
//
@@ -281,10 +281,10 @@ namespace bpkg
diag_record dr (fail);
dr << "unable to negotiate acceptable configuration with dependent "
- << dept.key << " for dependencies ";
+ << dept.package << " for dependencies ";
for (size_t i (0); i != depcs.size (); ++i)
- dr << (i == 0 ? "" : ", ") << depcs[i].get ().key;
+ dr << (i == 0 ? "" : ", ") << depcs[i].get ().package;
dr << info << "configuration before negotiation:\n";
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ namespace bpkg
for (package_skeleton& depc: depcs)
{
- package_configuration& cfg (cfgs[depc.key]);
+ package_configuration& cfg (cfgs[depc.package]);
for (config_variable_value& v: cfg)
{
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ namespace bpkg
dependent_config_variable_values new_cfgs;
for (package_skeleton& depc: depcs)
{
- package_configuration& cfg (cfgs[depc.key]);
+ package_configuration& cfg (cfgs[depc.package]);
for (config_variable_value& v: cfg)
{
@@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ namespace bpkg
diag_record dr (fail);
dr << "unable to negotiate acceptable configuration between dependents "
- << dept.key;
+ << dept.package;
// Analyze the O->N changes and determine the problematic dependent(s).
// Do we actually know for sure they are all problematic? Well, they
@@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ namespace bpkg
small_vector<reference_wrapper<const package_key>, 1> depts; // Duplicates.
for (const dependent_config_variable_value& nv: new_cfgs)
{
- if (nv.dependent == dept.key)
+ if (nv.dependent == dept.package)
{
if (const dependent_config_variable_value* ov = old_cfgs.find (nv.name))
{
@@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ namespace bpkg
dr << " for dependencies ";
for (size_t i (0); i != depcs.size (); ++i)
- dr << (i == 0 ? "" : ", ") << depcs[i].get ().key;
+ dr << (i == 0 ? "" : ", ") << depcs[i].get ().package;
dr << info << "configuration before negotiation:\n";
for (const package_configuration& cfg: depc_cfgs)