aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKaren Arutyunov <karen@codesynthesis.com>2022-05-06 20:36:01 +0300
committerKaren Arutyunov <karen@codesynthesis.com>2022-06-07 21:14:14 +0300
commit2083388552850600f1422de758629aa70b4a5ddb (patch)
tree3e6801a00fa85c5d9f5091ec0acad8a55dd39ba4
parentd3f0b99032a4289eaaefcbb4d7fe0106a3106208 (diff)
Add shadow dependents and shadow cluster
-rw-r--r--bpkg/pkg-build.cxx919
-rw-r--r--tests/pkg-build.testscript302
2 files changed, 768 insertions, 453 deletions
diff --git a/bpkg/pkg-build.cxx b/bpkg/pkg-build.cxx
index 9725d63..d107881 100644
--- a/bpkg/pkg-build.cxx
+++ b/bpkg/pkg-build.cxx
@@ -632,8 +632,12 @@ namespace bpkg
// Note: it shouldn't be very common for a dependency to contain more than
// two true alternatives.
//
- optional<small_vector<reference_wrapper<const dependency_alternative>, 2>>
- postponed_dependency_alternatives;
+ using dependency_alternatives_refs =
+ small_vector<pair<reference_wrapper<const dependency_alternative>,
+ size_t>,
+ 2>;
+
+ optional<dependency_alternatives_refs> postponed_dependency_alternatives;
// True if the recursive collection of the package has been started or
// performed.
@@ -1195,16 +1199,29 @@ namespace bpkg
class dependency: public packages
{
public:
- size_t position;
+ pair<size_t, size_t> position;
- dependency (size_t p, packages deps)
- : packages (move (deps)), position (p) {}
+ dependency (const pair<size_t, size_t>& pos, packages deps)
+ : packages (move (deps)), position (pos) {}
};
- struct dependent_info
+ class dependent_info
{
+ public:
bool existing;
- vector<dependency> dependencies;
+ small_vector<dependency, 1> dependencies;
+
+ const dependency*
+ find_dependency (const pair<size_t, size_t>& pos) const
+ {
+ auto i (find_if (dependencies.begin (),
+ dependencies.end (),
+ [&pos] (const dependency& d)
+ {
+ return d.position == pos;
+ }));
+ return i != dependencies.end () ? &*i : nullptr;
+ }
};
using dependents_map = map<config_package, dependent_info>;
@@ -1216,6 +1233,12 @@ namespace bpkg
dependents_map dependents;
dependencies_set dependencies;
+ using positions = small_vector<pair<size_t, size_t>, 1>;
+ using shadow_dependents_map = map<config_package, positions>;
+
+ shadow_dependents_map shadow_dependents;
+ shadow_dependents_map shadow_cluster;
+
// Absent -- not negotiated yet, false -- being negotiated, true -- has
// been negotiated.
//
@@ -1226,20 +1249,18 @@ namespace bpkg
//
size_t depth = 0;
- dependents_map shadow_dependents;
-
// Add dependencies of a new dependent.
//
postponed_configuration (config_package&& dependent,
bool existing,
- size_t position,
+ const pair<size_t, size_t>& position,
packages&& deps)
{
- assert (position != 0);
+ assert (position.first != 0 && position.second != 0);
dependencies.insert (deps.begin (), deps.end ());
- vector<dependency> ds ({dependency (position, move (deps))});
+ small_vector<dependency, 1> ds ({dependency (position, move (deps))});
dependents.emplace (move (dependent),
dependent_info {existing, move (ds)});
@@ -1291,9 +1312,13 @@ namespace bpkg
return false;
}
+ // Note: doesn't change the negotiate member of this configuration.
+ //
void
merge (postponed_configuration&& c)
{
+ // Merge dependents.
+ //
for (auto& d: c.dependents)
{
auto i (dependents.find (d.first));
@@ -1305,25 +1330,14 @@ namespace bpkg
for (dependency& sd: sdi.dependencies)
{
- auto i (find_if (ddi.dependencies.begin (),
- ddi.dependencies.end (),
- [&sd] (const dependency& dd)
- {
- return dd.position == sd.position;
- }));
-
- if (i != ddi.dependencies.end ())
- {
- dependency& dd (*i);
+ const dependency* dep (ddi.find_dependency (sd.position));
- for (config_package& p: sd)
- {
- if (find (dd.begin (), dd.end (), p) == dd.end ())
- dd.push_back (move (p));
- }
- }
- else
+ if (dep == nullptr)
ddi.dependencies.push_back (move (sd));
+ else
+ // If present, must contain the same dependency packages.
+ //
+ assert (static_cast<const packages&> (*dep) == sd);
}
if (!ddi.existing)
@@ -1333,6 +1347,8 @@ namespace bpkg
dependents.emplace (d.first, move (d.second));
}
+ // Merge dependencies.
+ //
// Looks like C++17 set::merge() is what we need. Note, however, that
// some older standard libraries (for example libc++ 7.0.0) don't
// support this function. Thus, let's enable its use based on the
@@ -1355,67 +1371,93 @@ namespace bpkg
else
depth = c.depth;
- // Merging negotiated configurations results in a non-negotiated one.
- //
- // @@ On the shadow dependent perhaps, but probably not on the shadow
- // cluster.
- //
- negotiated = nullopt;
-
// Merge shadow dependents.
//
// This is only necessary if all the merged non-shadow configurations
// have already been negotiated (otherwise we throw and replace the
// shadow with newly merged non-shadow).
//
- for (auto& d: shadow_dependents)
+ for (auto& d: c.shadow_dependents)
{
- for (dependency& p: d.second.dependencies)
- add_shadow (d.first, p.position, move (p));
+ auto i (shadow_dependents.find (d.first));
+
+ if (i != shadow_dependents.end ())
+ {
+ const positions& sps (d.second);
+ positions& dps (i->second);
+
+ for (const auto& sp: sps)
+ {
+ if (find (dps.begin (), dps.end (), sp) == dps.end ())
+ dps.push_back (sp);
+ }
+ }
+ else
+ shadow_dependents.emplace (d.first, move (d.second));
}
}
void
- add_shadow (config_package dependent,
- size_t position,
- packages deps)
+ add_shadow (config_package dependent, const pair<size_t, size_t> pos)
{
auto i (shadow_dependents.find (dependent));
if (i != shadow_dependents.end ())
{
- vector<dependency>& dds (i->second.dependencies);
-
- auto i (find_if (dds.begin (), dds.end (),
- [position] (const dependency& d)
- {
- return d.position == position;
- }));
+ positions& ps (i->second);
+ if (find (ps.begin (), ps.end (), pos) == ps.end ())
+ ps.push_back (pos);
+ }
+ else
+ shadow_dependents.emplace (move (dependent), positions ({pos}));
+ }
- if (i != dds.end ())
- {
- dependency& d (*i);
+ bool
+ contains_shadow_dependent (config_package dependent,
+ const pair<size_t, size_t> pos) const
+ {
+ auto i (shadow_dependents.find (dependent));
- for (config_package& p: deps)
- {
- if (find (d.begin (), d.end (), p) == d.end ())
- d.push_back (move (p));
- }
- }
- else
- dds.push_back (dependency (position, move (deps)));
+ if (i != shadow_dependents.end ())
+ {
+ const positions& ps (i->second);
+ return find (ps.begin (), ps.end (), pos) != ps.end ();
}
else
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ void
+ shadow (postponed_configuration&& c)
+ {
+ shadow_cluster.clear ();
+
+ for (auto& dt: c.dependents)
{
- vector<dependency> ds ({dependency (position, move (deps))});
+ positions ps;
+ for (auto& d: dt.second.dependencies)
+ ps.push_back (d.position);
- shadow_dependents.emplace (move (dependent),
- dependent_info {false /* existing */,
- move (ds)});
+ shadow_cluster.emplace (dt.first, move (ps));
}
}
bool
+ contains_shadow_cluster (config_package dependent,
+ const pair<size_t, size_t> pos) const
+ {
+ auto i (shadow_cluster.find (dependent));
+
+ if (i != shadow_cluster.end ())
+ {
+ const positions& ps (i->second);
+ return find (ps.begin (), ps.end (), pos) != ps.end ();
+ }
+ else
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ bool
existing_dependent (const config_package& cp) const
{
auto i (dependents.find (cp));
@@ -1436,8 +1478,11 @@ namespace bpkg
// '^' character that may follow a dependent indicates that this is an
// existing dependent.
//
- // <position> is the 1-based serial number of the respective depends value
- // in the dependent's manifest.
+ // <position> = <depends-index>','<alternative-index>
+ //
+ // <depends-index> and <alternative-index> are the 1-based serial numbers
+ // of the respective depends value and the dependency alternative in the
+ // dependent's manifest.
//
// See config_package for details on <package>.
//
@@ -1484,7 +1529,9 @@ namespace bpkg
r += dt.first.string ();
r += '/';
- r += to_string (dp.position);
+ r += to_string (dp.position.first);
+ r += ',';
+ r += to_string (dp.position.second);
}
}
}
@@ -1505,10 +1552,14 @@ namespace bpkg
//
struct retry_configuration
{
- size_t depth;
- config_package dependent;
- size_t position;
- postponed_configuration::packages dependencies;
+ size_t depth;
+ config_package dependent;
+ pair<size_t, size_t> position;
+ };
+
+ struct merge_configuration
+ {
+ size_t depth;
};
// Note that we could be adding new/merging existing entries while
@@ -1529,24 +1580,156 @@ namespace bpkg
pair<postponed_configuration&, bool>
add (config_package dependent,
bool existing,
- size_t position,
+ const pair<size_t, size_t>& position,
postponed_configuration::packages dependencies)
{
tracer trace ("postponed_configurations::add");
assert (!dependencies.empty ());
- // The plan is to add the specified dependent/dependencies to the first
- // found dependency-intersecting cluster, if present, and then merge
- // into it all other intersecting clusters. If no intersection is found,
- // then add the new cluster.
+ // The plan is to first go through the existing clusters and check if
+ // any of them contain this dependent/dependencies in their shadow
+ // clusters. If such a cluster is found, then force-add them to
+ // it. Otherwise, add the specified dependent/dependencies to the first
+ // found dependency-intersecting cluster, if present, and add the new
+ // cluster otherwise. Afterwards, merge into the resulting cluster other
+ // dependency-intersecting clusters.
//
+ iterator ri;
+ bool rb;
+
// Note that if a single dependency is added, then it can only belong to
- // a single existing cluster and so no clusters merge can happen. Let's
- // optimize for the common case based on this fact.
+ // a single existing cluster and so no clusters merge can happen, unless
+ // we are force-adding. In the later case we can only merge once for a
+ // single dependency.
+ //
+ // Let's optimize for the common case based on these facts.
//
bool single (dependencies.size () == 1);
+ // Merge dependency-intersecting clusters in the specified range into
+ // the resulting cluster. Return true if any clusters have been merged.
+ //
+ // The iterator arguments refer to entries before and after the range
+ // endpoints, respectively.
+ //
+ auto merge = [&trace, &ri, &rb, single, this] (iterator i,
+ iterator e,
+ bool shadow_based)
+ {
+ postponed_configuration& c1 (*ri);
+
+ bool r (false);
+ iterator j (i);
+
+ // Merge the intersecting configurations.
+ //
+ for (++i; i != e; ++i)
+ {
+ postponed_configuration& c2 (*i);
+
+ if (c2.contains_dependency (c1))
+ {
+ if (!c2.negotiated || !*c2.negotiated)
+ rb = false;
+
+ // Merge into the outermost-depth negotiated configuration of
+ // the two, unless we are force-merging into the shadow-matching
+ // cluster.
+ //
+ if (!shadow_based &&
+ c2.depth != 0 &&
+ (c1.depth == 0 || c1.depth > c2.depth))
+ {
+ l5 ([&]{trace << "merge " << c1 << " into " << c2;});
+ c2.merge (move (c1));
+
+ // Mark configuration as the one being moved from for
+ // subsequent erasing from the list.
+ //
+ c1.dependencies.clear ();
+
+ ri = i;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ l5 ([&]{trace << "merge " << c2 << " into " << c1;});
+
+ assert (!shadow_based || (c2.negotiated && *c2.negotiated));
+
+ c1.merge (move (c2));
+ c2.dependencies.clear (); // Mark as moved from (see above).
+ }
+
+ r = true;
+
+ if (single)
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Erase configurations which we have merged from.
+ //
+ if (r)
+ {
+ i = j;
+
+ for (++i; i != end (); )
+ {
+ if (!i->dependencies.empty ())
+ {
+ ++i;
+ ++j;
+ }
+ else
+ i = erase_after (j);
+ }
+ }
+
+ return r;
+ };
+
+ // Try to add based on the shadow cluster.
+ //
+ {
+ auto i (begin ());
+ auto j (before_begin ()); // Precedes iterator i.
+
+ for (; i != end (); ++i, ++j)
+ {
+ postponed_configuration& c (*i);
+
+ if (c.contains_shadow_cluster (dependent, position))
+ {
+ postponed_configuration tc (move (dependent),
+ existing,
+ position,
+ move (dependencies));
+
+ l5 ([&]{trace << "add " << tc << " to " << c << " (shadow)";});
+
+ c.merge (move (tc));
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (i != end ())
+ {
+ ri = i;
+
+ // @@ This can end up cycling with continuous throwing
+ // merge_configuration.
+ //
+ rb = (i->negotiated && *i->negotiated);
+ //rb = true;
+
+ if (!merge (before_begin (), i, true /* shadow_based */) || !single)
+ merge (i, end (), true /* shadow_based */);
+
+ return make_pair (ref (*ri), rb);
+ }
+ }
+
auto i (begin ());
auto j (before_begin ()); // Precedes iterator i.
@@ -1568,19 +1751,16 @@ namespace bpkg
}
}
- iterator ri;
- bool rb;
-
if (i == end ())
{
// Insert after the last element.
//
ri = insert_after (j,
- postponed_configuration (
- move (dependent),
- existing,
- position,
- move (dependencies)));
+ postponed_configuration (
+ move (dependent),
+ existing,
+ position,
+ move (dependencies)));
rb = false;
@@ -1592,59 +1772,7 @@ namespace bpkg
rb = (i->negotiated && *i->negotiated);
if (!single)
- {
- // Merge the intersecting configurations.
- //
- for (++i; i != end (); ++i)
- {
- postponed_configuration& c1 (*ri);
- postponed_configuration& c2 (*i);
-
- if (c1.contains_dependency (c2))
- {
- if (!c2.negotiated || !*c2.negotiated)
- rb = false;
-
- // Merge into the outermost-depth negotiated configuration of
- // the two.
- //
- if (c2.depth != 0 && (c1.depth == 0 || c1.depth > c2.depth))
- {
- l5 ([&]{trace << "merge " << c1 << " into " << c2;});
- c2.merge (move (c1));
-
- // Mark configuration as the one being moved from for
- // subsequent erasing from the list.
- //
- c1.dependencies.clear ();
-
- ri = i;
- }
- else
- {
- l5 ([&]{trace << "merge " << c2 << " into " << c1;});
-
- c1.merge (move (c2));
- c2.dependencies.clear (); // Mark as moved from (see above).
- }
- }
- }
-
- // Erase configurations which are merged from.
- //
- i = j;
-
- for (++i; i != end (); )
- {
- if (!i->dependencies.empty ())
- {
- ++i;
- ++j;
- }
- else
- i = erase_after (j);
- }
- }
+ merge (i, end (), false /* shadow_based */);
}
return make_pair (ref (*ri), rb);
@@ -2580,7 +2708,7 @@ namespace bpkg
// Add an empty alternatives list into the selected dependency list if
// there are none.
//
- small_vector<reference_wrapper<const dependency_alternative>, 2> edas;
+ build_package::dependency_alternatives_refs edas;
if (pkg.postponed_dependency_alternatives)
{
@@ -2589,10 +2717,12 @@ namespace bpkg
}
else
{
- for (const dependency_alternative& da: das)
+ for (size_t i (0); i != das.size (); ++i)
{
+ const dependency_alternative& da (das[i]);
+
if (!da.enable || skel.evaluate_enable (*da.enable, di))
- edas.push_back (da);
+ edas.push_back (make_pair (ref (da), i));
}
}
@@ -3382,8 +3512,14 @@ namespace bpkg
&di,
&trace,
this]
- (const dependency_alternative& da, prebuilds&& bs)
+ (const dependency_alternative& da,
+ size_t dai,
+ prebuilds&& bs)
{
+ // Dependency alternative position.
+ //
+ pair<size_t, size_t> dp (di + 1, dai + 1);
+
postponed_configuration::packages cfg_deps;
for (prebuild& b: bs)
@@ -3644,7 +3780,7 @@ namespace bpkg
postponed_cfgs);
}
- // If this dependent has any dependencies with configruations
+ // If this dependent has any dependencies with configurations
// clauses, then we need to deal with that.
//
if (!cfg_deps.empty ())
@@ -3672,10 +3808,7 @@ namespace bpkg
// constructing exception.
//
pair<postponed_configuration&, bool> r (
- postponed_cfgs.add (cp,
- false /* existing */,
- di + 1,
- cfg_deps));
+ postponed_cfgs.add (cp, false /* existing */, dp, cfg_deps));
// Up-negotiate this dependent and re-negotiate (refine) postponed
// if any (being) negotiated configurations were involved into the
@@ -3687,7 +3820,7 @@ namespace bpkg
return false; // Cases (1) or (2).
else
{
- // Cases (3).
+ // Case (3).
//
// If this is the first time we are here (see below), then we
// up-negotiate the configuration and throw retry_configuration
@@ -3701,14 +3834,11 @@ namespace bpkg
// cluster contains the shadow dependents map (see the catch
// site for details).
//
- // @@ Feels like we need dependency alternative position rather
- // that cfg_deps to track this.
- //
- if (!cfg.contains_shadow (cp, di + 1, cfg_deps))
+ if (!cfg.contains_shadow_dependent (cp, dp))
{
// The "first time" case.
//
- l5 ([&]{trace << "adding cfg-postponing dependent "
+ l5 ([&]{trace << "cfg-postponing dependent "
<< pkg.available_name_version_db ()
<< " involves negotiated configurations and "
<< "results in " << cfg
@@ -3716,8 +3846,11 @@ namespace bpkg
// up_negotiate (...);
- throw retry_configuration {
- cfg.depth, move (cp), di + 1, move (cfg_deps)};
+ // Don't print the "while satisfying..." chain.
+ //
+ dep_chain.clear ();
+
+ throw retry_configuration {cfg.depth, move (cp), dp};
}
else
{
@@ -3734,8 +3867,54 @@ namespace bpkg
// being in the middle of negotiation, then we need to get
// this cluster into the fully negotiated state.
//
+ l5 ([&]{trace << "dependent "
+ << pkg.available_name_version_db ()
+ << " is a shadow dependent for " << cfg;});
+
if (r.second)
- return true; // The everything already negotiated case.
+ {
+ // The everything already negotiated case.
+ //
+ l5 ([&]{trace << "configuration for cfg-postponed "
+ << "dependencies of dependent "
+ << pkg.available_name_version_db ()
+ << " is negotiated";});
+
+ // Note that we still need to recursively collect the not
+ // yet collected dependencies before indicating to the
+ // caller (returning true) that we are done with this
+ // depends value and the dependent is not postponed.
+ //
+ for (const config_package& p: cfg_deps)
+ {
+ build_package* b (entered_build (p));
+ assert (b != nullptr); // @@ TMP
+
+ if (!b->recursive_collection)
+ {
+ l5 ([&]{trace << "collecting cfg-postponed dependency "
+ << b->available_name_version_db ()
+ << " of dependent "
+ << pkg.available_name_version_db ();});
+
+ collect_build_prerequisites (options,
+ *b,
+ fdb,
+ rpt_depts,
+ apc,
+ initial_collection,
+ replaced_vers,
+ dep_chain,
+ postponed_repo,
+ postponed_alts,
+ 0 /* max_alt_index */,
+ postponed_deps,
+ postponed_cfgs);
+ }
+ }
+
+ return true;
+ }
else
{
// The partially negotiated case.
@@ -3754,13 +3933,13 @@ namespace bpkg
//
// So the approach we will use is the "shadow" idea but for
// merging clusters rather than up-negotiating a
- // configuration. Specifically, we throw retry_configuration
+ // configuration. Specifically, we throw merge_configuration
// to the outer try/catch. At the catch site we make the
// newly merged cluster a shadow of the restored cluster and
// retry the same steps similar to retry_configuration. As
// we redo these steps, we consult the shadow cluster and if
// the dependent/dependency entry is there, then instead of
- // adding it to another (new/exsiting) cluster that would
+ // adding it to another (new/existing) cluster that would
// later be merged into this non-shadow cluster, we add it
// directly to the non-shadow cluster (potentially merging
// other cluster which it feels like by definition should
@@ -3770,10 +3949,17 @@ namespace bpkg
//
// The shadow check is part of postponed_configs::add().
//
- // @@ Add assert() that shadow-based merge always results in
- // fully negotiated cluster.
+ l5 ([&]{trace << "cfg-postponing dependent "
+ << pkg.available_name_version_db ()
+ << " involves non-negotiated configurations "
+ << "and results in " << cfg << ", throwing "
+ << "merge_configuration";});
+
+ // Don't print the "while satisfying..." chain.
//
- throw retry_configuration {cfg.depth};
+ dep_chain.clear ();
+
+ throw merge_configuration {cfg.depth};
}
}
}
@@ -3853,7 +4039,7 @@ namespace bpkg
for (size_t i (0); i != edas.size (); ++i)
{
- const dependency_alternative& da (edas[i]);
+ const dependency_alternative& da (edas[i].first);
precollect_result r (precollect (da, das.buildtime, prereqs));
@@ -3908,7 +4094,9 @@ namespace bpkg
&postpone, &collect, &select]
(size_t index, precollect_result&& r)
{
- const dependency_alternative& da (edas[index]);
+ const auto& eda (edas[index]);
+ const dependency_alternative& da (eda.first);
+ size_t dai (eda.second);
// Postpone the collection if the alternatives maximum index is
// reached.
@@ -3918,7 +4106,7 @@ namespace bpkg
l5 ([&]{trace << "alt-postpone dependent "
<< pkg.available_name_version_db ()
<< " since max index is reached: " << index <<
- info << "dependency alternative: " << da.string ();});
+ info << "dependency alternative: " << da;});
postpone (postponed_alts);
return true;
@@ -3934,7 +4122,7 @@ namespace bpkg
//
assert (postponed_alts != nullptr);
- if (!collect (da, move (*r.builds)))
+ if (!collect (da, dai, move (*r.builds)))
{
postpone (nullptr); // Already inserted into postponed_cfgs.
return true;
@@ -3984,9 +4172,11 @@ namespace bpkg
{
assert (first_alt && first_alt->second.builds);
- const dependency_alternative& da (edas[first_alt->first]);
+ const auto& eda (edas[first_alt->first]);
+ const dependency_alternative& da (eda.first);
+ size_t dai (eda.second);
- if (!collect (da, move (*first_alt->second.builds)))
+ if (!collect (da, dai, move (*first_alt->second.builds)))
{
postpone (nullptr); // Already inserted into postponed_cfgs.
break;
@@ -4017,8 +4207,8 @@ namespace bpkg
if (alts_num == 0)
{
diag_record dr;
- for (const dependency_alternative& da: edas)
- precollect (da, das.buildtime, nullptr /* prereqs */, &dr);
+ for (const auto& da: edas)
+ precollect (da.first, das.buildtime, nullptr /* prereqs */, &dr);
assert (!dr.empty ());
@@ -4041,8 +4231,8 @@ namespace bpkg
<< pkg.available_name_version_db ()
<< " due to ambiguous alternatives";
- for (const dependency_alternative& da: edas)
- dr << info << "alternative: " << da.string ();
+ for (const auto& da: edas)
+ dr << info << "alternative: " << da.first;
}
postpone (postponed_alts);
@@ -4055,10 +4245,10 @@ namespace bpkg
info << "explicitly specify dependency packages to manually "
<< "select the alternative";
- for (const dependency_alternative& da: edas)
+ for (const auto& da: edas)
{
precollect_result r (
- precollect (da, das.buildtime, nullptr /* prereqs */));
+ precollect (da.first, das.buildtime, nullptr /* prereqs */));
if (r.builds)
{
@@ -4483,6 +4673,8 @@ namespace bpkg
if (pcfg != nullptr)
{
+ using packages = postponed_configuration::packages;
+
// @@ TODO Negotiate the config.
//
// Notes:
@@ -4499,6 +4691,16 @@ namespace bpkg
//
assert (!pcfg->negotiated);
+ // @@ Before negotiating the cluster we should look if there is a
+ // shadow cluster which fully contains this cluster. (Question: can
+ // we end up with multiple shadow clusters? Probably we don't
+ // expect this, so assert.) If that's the case it actually needs to
+ // be force-merged into the cluster containing the shadow instead
+ // of negotiating it here. Should we just merge-force on the
+ // merge_configuration catch site all those non-negotiated clusters
+ // which are fully contained in the shadow cluster.
+ //
+
// Re-evaluate existing dependents with configuration clause of this
// config dependencies up to these dependencies. Omit dependents which
// are already being built or dropped. Add these dependents to this
@@ -4524,7 +4726,7 @@ namespace bpkg
shared_ptr<selected_package> selected;
shared_ptr<available_package> available;
lazy_shared_ptr<bpkg::repository_fragment> repository_fragment;
- postponed_configuration::packages dependencies;
+ packages dependencies;
};
map<config_package, dependent_info> dependents;
@@ -4599,9 +4801,11 @@ namespace bpkg
// @@ Re-evaluate up-to the cluster's dependencies.
+ // @@ TMP
+ //
postponed_cfgs.add (move (cp),
true /* existing */,
- 1,
+ make_pair (1, 1),
move (ds));
}
}
@@ -4622,6 +4826,20 @@ namespace bpkg
//
pcfg->negotiated = false;
+ // Note that we can be adding new packages to the being negotiated
+ // cluster by calling collect_build_prerequisites() for its
+ // dependencies and dependents. Thus, we need to stash the current
+ // list of dependencies and dependents and iterate over them.
+ //
+ packages dependencies (pcfg->dependencies.begin (),
+ pcfg->dependencies.end ());
+
+ packages dependents;
+ dependents.reserve (pcfg->dependents.size ());
+
+ for (const auto& p: pcfg->dependents)
+ dependents.push_back (p.first);
+
// Process dependencies recursively with this config.
//
// Note that there could be inter-dependecies between these packages,
@@ -4629,51 +4847,50 @@ namespace bpkg
//
l5 ([&]{trace << "recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependencies";});
- for (const config_package& p: pcfg->dependencies)
+ for (const config_package& p: dependencies)
{
- // Workaround GCC 4.9 'cannot call member function without object'
- // error.
- //
- build_package* b (this->entered_build (p));
+ build_package* b (entered_build (p));
assert (b != nullptr);
- build_package_refs dep_chain;
-
- this->collect_build_prerequisites (o,
- *b,
- fdb,
- rpt_depts,
- apc,
- false /* initial_collection */,
- replaced_vers,
- dep_chain,
- &postponed_repo,
- &postponed_alts,
- 0 /* max_alt_index */,
- postponed_deps,
- postponed_cfgs);
+ // Skip the dependencies which are already collected recursively.
+ //
+ if (!b->recursive_collection)
+ {
+ build_package_refs dep_chain;
+
+ collect_build_prerequisites (o,
+ *b,
+ fdb,
+ rpt_depts,
+ apc,
+ false /* initial_collection */,
+ replaced_vers,
+ dep_chain,
+ &postponed_repo,
+ &postponed_alts,
+ 0 /* max_alt_index */,
+ postponed_deps,
+ postponed_cfgs);
+ }
+ else
+ l5 ([&]{trace << "dependency " << b->available_name_version_db ()
+ << " is already (being) recursively collected, "
+ << "skipping";});
}
// Continue processing dependents with this config.
//
l5 ([&]{trace << "recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependents";});
- for (const auto& p: pcfg->dependents)
+ for (const auto& p: dependents)
{
- // Note that re-evaluated existing dependents should be treated as
- // other dependents at this point (they also have
- // postponed_dependency_alternatives present, etc).
- //
- //if (p.second.existing)
- // continue;
-
- build_package* b (this->entered_build (p.first));
+ build_package* b (entered_build (p));
assert (b != nullptr); // @@ TMP
//assert (b != nullptr && b->postponed_dependency_alternatives);
build_package_refs dep_chain;
- this->collect_build_prerequisites (
+ collect_build_prerequisites (
o,
*b,
fdb,
@@ -4722,19 +4939,19 @@ namespace bpkg
build_package_refs dep_chain;
- this->collect_build_prerequisites (o,
- *p,
- fdb,
- rpt_depts,
- apc,
- false /* initial_collection */,
- replaced_vers,
- dep_chain,
- &prs,
- &pas,
- 0 /* max_alt_index */,
- postponed_deps,
- postponed_cfgs);
+ collect_build_prerequisites (o,
+ *p,
+ fdb,
+ rpt_depts,
+ apc,
+ false /* initial_collection */,
+ replaced_vers,
+ dep_chain,
+ &prs,
+ &pas,
+ 0 /* max_alt_index */,
+ postponed_deps,
+ postponed_cfgs);
}
// Save the potential new dependency alternative-related postpones.
@@ -4773,107 +4990,113 @@ namespace bpkg
size_t pcd (depth + 1);
pc->depth = pcd;
- // First assume we can negotiate this configuration rolling back if
- // this doesn't pan out.
- //
- snapshot s (*this,
- postponed_repo,
- postponed_alts,
- postponed_deps,
- postponed_cfgs);
-
for (;;) // Either return or retry the same cluster.
- try
{
- collect_build_postponed (o,
- replaced_vers,
- postponed_repo,
- postponed_alts,
- postponed_deps,
- postponed_cfgs,
- fdb,
- rpt_depts,
- apc,
- pc);
-
- // If collect() returns (instead of throwing), this means it
- // processed everything that was postponed.
+ // First assume we can negotiate this configuration rolling back
+ // if this doesn't pan out.
//
- assert (postponed_repo.empty () &&
- postponed_cfgs.negotiated () &&
- postponed_alts.empty () &&
- !postponed_deps.has_bogus ());
+ snapshot s (*this,
+ postponed_repo,
+ postponed_alts,
+ postponed_deps,
+ postponed_cfgs);
- l5 ([&]{trace << "end";});
+ try
+ {
+ collect_build_postponed (o,
+ replaced_vers,
+ postponed_repo,
+ postponed_alts,
+ postponed_deps,
+ postponed_cfgs,
+ fdb,
+ rpt_depts,
+ apc,
+ pc);
+
+ // If collect() returns (instead of throwing), this means it
+ // processed everything that was postponed.
+ //
+ assert (postponed_repo.empty () &&
+ postponed_cfgs.negotiated () &&
+ postponed_alts.empty () &&
+ !postponed_deps.has_bogus ());
- return;
- }
- catch (retry_configuration& e)
- {
- // If this is not "our problem", then keep looking.
- //
- if (e.depth != pcd)
- throw;
+ l5 ([&]{trace << "end";});
- // Restore the state from snapshot.
- //
- // Note: postponed_cfgs is re-assigned.
- //
- s.restore (*this,
- postponed_repo,
- postponed_alts,
- postponed_deps,
- postponed_cfgs);
+ return;
+ }
+ catch (retry_configuration& e)
+ {
+ // If this is not "our problem", then keep looking.
+ //
+ if (e.depth != pcd)
+ throw;
- pc = &postponed_cfgs[i];
+ // Restore the state from snapshot.
+ //
+ // Note: postponed_cfgs is re-assigned.
+ //
+ s.restore (*this,
+ postponed_repo,
+ postponed_alts,
+ postponed_deps,
+ postponed_cfgs);
- l5 ([&]{trace << "cfg-negotiation of " << *pc << " failed due to "
- << "dependent " << e.dependent
- << ", re-negotiating";});
+ pc = &postponed_cfgs[i];
- // Record the dependent/dependencies/position that triggered this
- // so that we don't repeat this up-negotiate/throw/catch dance
- // when we retry collect_build_postponed().
- //
- // Note that there is also a possibility of having a "bogus"
- // dependent/dependencies (i.e., we add them to the cluster but
- // they never get re-visited). @@ While seems harmless, maybe we
- // need to prune the part of the configuration that was added
- // by them?
- //
- pc->add_shadow (move (e.dependent),
- e.position,
- move (e.dependencies));
- }
- catch (merge_configuration& e)
- {
- // If this is not "our problem", then keep looking.
- //
- if (e.depth != pcd)
- throw;
+ l5 ([&]{trace << "cfg-negotiation of " << *pc << " failed due "
+ << "to dependent " << e.dependent << ", adding "
+ << "shadow dependent and re-negotiating";});
+
+ // Record the dependent/dependencies/position that triggered this
+ // so that we don't repeat this up-negotiate/throw/catch dance
+ // when we retry collect_build_postponed().
+ //
+ // Note that there is also a possibility of having a "bogus"
+ // dependent/dependencies (i.e., we add them to the cluster but
+ // they never get re-visited). @@ While seems harmless, maybe we
+ // need to prune the part of the configuration that was added
+ // by them?
+ //
+ pc->add_shadow (move (e.dependent), e.position);
+ }
+ catch (merge_configuration& e)
+ {
+ // If this is not "our problem", then keep looking.
+ //
+ if (e.depth != pcd)
+ throw;
- postponed_configuration shadow (move (*pc));
+ postponed_configuration shadow (move (*pc));
- // Restore the state from snapshot.
- //
- // Note: postponed_cfgs is re-assigned.
- //
- s.restore (*this,
- postponed_repo,
- postponed_alts,
- postponed_deps,
- postponed_cfgs);
-
- pc = &postponed_cfgs[i];
-
- // @@ TODO
- /*
- l5 ([&]{trace << "cfg-negotiation of " << *pc << " failed due to "
- << "dependent " << e.dependent
- << ", re-negotiating";});
- */
-
- pc->shadow = move (shadow); // @@ Try optional<>.
+ // Restore the state from snapshot.
+ //
+ // Note: postponed_cfgs is re-assigned.
+ //
+ s.restore (*this,
+ postponed_repo,
+ postponed_alts,
+ postponed_deps,
+ postponed_cfgs);
+
+ pc = &postponed_cfgs[i];
+
+ l5 ([&]{trace << "cfg-negotiation of " << *pc << " failed due "
+ << "to non-negotiated clusters, force-merging "
+ << "based on shadow cluster " << shadow;});
+
+ pc->shadow (move (shadow));
+
+ // @@ TODO: Here we also need to go through all the
+ // non-negotiated clusters (the negotiated member is absent)
+ // and force-merge into this cluster those of them, which are
+ // subsets of the shadow cluster. Being a subset means that
+ // each its dependent is present in the shadow cluster with
+ // all its dependency positions being a subset of those for
+ // the respective dependent in the shadow cluster.
+ //
+ }
}
}
@@ -4949,19 +5172,19 @@ namespace bpkg
l5 ([&]{trace << "index " << i << " collect alt-postponed "
<< p->available_name_version_db ();});
- this->collect_build_prerequisites (o,
- *p,
- fdb,
- rpt_depts,
- apc,
- false /* initial_collection */,
- replaced_vers,
- dep_chain,
- &prs,
- &pas,
- i,
- postponed_deps,
- postponed_cfgs);
+ collect_build_prerequisites (o,
+ *p,
+ fdb,
+ rpt_depts,
+ apc,
+ false /* initial_collection */,
+ replaced_vers,
+ dep_chain,
+ &prs,
+ &pas,
+ i,
+ postponed_deps,
+ postponed_cfgs);
prog = (pas.find (p) == pas.end () ||
ndep != p->dependencies->size ());
@@ -5016,19 +5239,19 @@ namespace bpkg
{
build_package_refs dep_chain;
- this->collect_build_prerequisites (o,
- **postponed_repo.begin (),
- fdb,
- rpt_depts,
- apc,
- false /* initial_collection */,
- replaced_vers,
- dep_chain,
- nullptr,
- nullptr,
- 0,
- postponed_deps,
- postponed_cfgs);
+ collect_build_prerequisites (o,
+ **postponed_repo.begin (),
+ fdb,
+ rpt_depts,
+ apc,
+ false /* initial_collection */,
+ replaced_vers,
+ dep_chain,
+ nullptr,
+ nullptr,
+ 0,
+ postponed_deps,
+ postponed_cfgs);
assert (false); // Can't be here.
}
@@ -5037,19 +5260,19 @@ namespace bpkg
{
build_package_refs dep_chain;
- this->collect_build_prerequisites (o,
- **postponed_alts.begin (),
- fdb,
- rpt_depts,
- apc,
- false /* initial_collection */,
- replaced_vers,
- dep_chain,
- nullptr,
- nullptr,
- 0,
- postponed_deps,
- postponed_cfgs);
+ collect_build_prerequisites (o,
+ **postponed_alts.begin (),
+ fdb,
+ rpt_depts,
+ apc,
+ false /* initial_collection */,
+ replaced_vers,
+ dep_chain,
+ nullptr,
+ nullptr,
+ 0,
+ postponed_deps,
+ postponed_cfgs);
assert (false); // Can't be here.
}
diff --git a/tests/pkg-build.testscript b/tests/pkg-build.testscript
index f270428..ebe41d1 100644
--- a/tests/pkg-build.testscript
+++ b/tests/pkg-build.testscript
@@ -4548,11 +4548,11 @@ test.options += --no-progress
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin foo/1.0.0
%.*
trace: collect_build: add libbar/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: recursively collect dependency libbar/1.0.0 of dependent foo/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: no cfg-clause for dependency libbar/1.0.0 of dependent foo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin libbar/1.0.0
%.*
trace: collect_build: add libbaz/0.1.0
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: recursively collect dependency libbaz/0.1.0 of dependent libbar/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: no cfg-clause for dependency libbaz/0.1.0 of dependent libbar/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin libbaz/0.1.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end libbaz/0.1.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end libbar/1.0.0
@@ -4572,18 +4572,18 @@ test.options += --no-progress
trace: collect_build: apply version replacement for libbar/1.0.0
trace: collect_build: replacement: libbar/0.1.0
trace: collect_build: add libbar/0.1.0
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: recursively collect dependency libbar/0.1.0 of dependent foo/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: no cfg-clause for dependency libbar/0.1.0 of dependent foo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin libbar/0.1.0
%.*
trace: collect_build: add libbaz/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: recursively collect dependency libbaz/1.0.0 of dependent libbar/0.1.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: no cfg-clause for dependency libbaz/1.0.0 of dependent libbar/0.1.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin libbaz/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end libbaz/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end libbar/0.1.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end foo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin bar/1.0.0
%.*
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: recursively collect dependency libbar/0.1.0 of dependent bar/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: no cfg-clause for dependency libbar/0.1.0 of dependent bar/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end bar/1.0.0
trace: execute_plan: simulate: yes
%.*
@@ -4623,7 +4623,7 @@ test.options += --no-progress
%.*
trace: collect_build: pick libbaz/0.1.0 over libbaz/1.0.0
trace: collect_build: libbaz/1.0.0 package version needs to be replaced in-place with libbaz/0.1.0
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: recursively collect dependency libbaz/0.1.0 of dependent libbar/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: no cfg-clause for dependency libbaz/0.1.0 of dependent libbar/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin libbaz/0.1.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end libbaz/0.1.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end libbar/1.0.0
@@ -4743,12 +4743,12 @@ test.options += --no-progress
%.*
trace: collect_build: add libfoo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent foo/1.0.0
- trace: postponed_configurations::add: create {foo | libfoo->{foo/1}}
+ trace: postponed_configurations::add: create {foo | libfoo->{foo/1,1}}
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: postpone foo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin fox/1.0.0
%.*
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent fox/1.0.0
- trace: postponed_configurations::add: add {fox | libfoo->{fox/1}} to {foo | libfoo->{foo/1}}
+ trace: postponed_configurations::add: add {fox | libfoo->{fox/1,1}} to {foo | libfoo->{foo/1,1}}
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: postpone fox/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin fux/1.0.0
%.*
@@ -4757,26 +4757,92 @@ test.options += --no-progress
trace: collect_build_postponed (0): begin
trace: collect_build_postponed (1): begin
%.*
- trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate begin {foo fox | libfoo->{foo/1 fox/1}}
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate begin {foo fox | libfoo->{foo/1,1 fox/1,1}}
trace: collect_build_postponed (1): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependencies
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin libfoo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end libfoo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_postponed (1): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependents
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: resume foo/1.0.0
%.*
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: skip cfg-negotiated dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent foo/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent foo/1.0.0
+ trace: postponed_configurations::add: add {foo | libfoo->{foo/1,1}} to {foo fox | libfoo->{foo/1,1 fox/1,1}}?
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postponing dependent foo/1.0.0 involves negotiated configurations and results in {foo fox | libfoo->{foo/1,1 fox/1,1}}?, throwing retry_configuration
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (0): cfg-negotiation of {foo fox | libfoo->{foo/1,1 fox/1,1}} failed due to dependent foo, adding shadow dependent and re-negotiating
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): begin
+ %.*
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate begin {foo fox | libfoo->{foo/1,1 fox/1,1}}
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependencies
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin libfoo/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end libfoo/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependents
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: resume foo/1.0.0
+ %.*
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent foo/1.0.0
+ trace: postponed_configurations::add: add {foo | libfoo->{foo/1,1}} to {foo fox | libfoo->{foo/1,1 fox/1,1}}?
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: dependent foo/1.0.0 is a shadow dependent for {foo fox | libfoo->{foo/1,1 fox/1,1}}?
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postponing dependent foo/1.0.0 involves non-negotiated configurations and results in {foo fox | libfoo->{foo/1,1 fox/1,1}}?, throwing merge_configuration
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (0): cfg-negotiation of {foo fox | libfoo->{foo/1,1 fox/1,1}} failed due to non-negotiated clusters, force-merging based on shadow cluster {foo fox | libfoo->{foo/1,1 fox/1,1}}?
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): begin
+ %.*
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate begin {foo fox | libfoo->{foo/1,1 fox/1,1}}
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependencies
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin libfoo/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end libfoo/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependents
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: resume foo/1.0.0
+ %.*
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent foo/1.0.0
+ trace: postponed_configurations::add: add {foo | libfoo->{foo/1,1}} to {foo fox | libfoo->{foo/1,1 fox/1,1}}? (shadow)
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: dependent foo/1.0.0 is a shadow dependent for {foo fox | libfoo->{foo/1,1 fox/1,1}}?
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postponing dependent foo/1.0.0 involves non-negotiated configurations and results in {foo fox | libfoo->{foo/1,1 fox/1,1}}?, throwing merge_configuration
+ ...........
+ EOE
+#\
+ $* foo fox fux 2>>~%EOE%;
+ %.*
+ trace: pkg_build: refine package collection/plan execution from scratch
+ %.*
+ trace: collect_build: add foo/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build: add fox/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build: add fux/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin foo/1.0.0
+ %.*
+ trace: collect_build: add libfoo/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent foo/1.0.0
+ trace: postponed_configurations::add: create {foo | libfoo->{foo/1,1}}
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: postpone foo/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin fox/1.0.0
+ %.*
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent fox/1.0.0
+ trace: postponed_configurations::add: add {fox | libfoo->{fox/1,1}} to {foo | libfoo->{foo/1,1}}
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: postpone fox/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin fux/1.0.0
+ %.*
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: dep-postpone dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent fux/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end fux/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (0): begin
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): begin
+ %.*
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate begin {foo fox | libfoo->{foo/1,1 fox/1,1}}
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependencies
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin libfoo/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end libfoo/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependents
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: resume foo/1.0.0
+ %.*
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: skip being cfg-negotiated dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent foo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end foo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: resume fox/1.0.0
%.*
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: skip cfg-negotiated dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent fox/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: skip being cfg-negotiated dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent fox/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end fox/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate end {foo fox | libfoo->{foo/1 fox/1}}
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate end {foo fox | libfoo->{foo/1,1 fox/1,1}}!
trace: collect_build_postponed (1): end
trace: collect_build_postponed (0): end
trace: execute_plan: simulate: yes
%.*
EOE
-
+#\
$pkg_status -r >>EOO;
!foo configured 1.0.0
libfoo configured 1.0.0
@@ -5066,6 +5132,8 @@ test.options += --no-progress
{
$clone_cfg;
+ $* fux foo fix 2>!;
+#\
$* fux foo fix 2>>~%EOE%;
%.*
trace: pkg_build: refine package collection/plan execution from scratch
@@ -5076,15 +5144,13 @@ test.options += --no-progress
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin fux/1.0.0
%.*
trace: collect_build: add libfoo/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: recursively collect dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent fux/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: no cfg-clause for dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent fux/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin libfoo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end libfoo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end fux/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin foo/1.0.0
%.*
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cannot cfg-postpone dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent foo/1.0.0 (collected prematurely), checking for configuration cycle
- trace: postponed_configurations::add: create {foo | libfoo->{foo/1}}
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: no configuration cycle, throwing
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cannot cfg-postpone dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent foo/1.0.0 (collected prematurely), throwing postpone_dependency
trace: pkg_build: collection failed due to prematurely collected dependency (libfoo), retry from scratch
%.*
trace: pkg_build: refine package collection/plan execution from scratch
@@ -5100,13 +5166,11 @@ test.options += --no-progress
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin foo/1.0.0
%.*
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent foo/1.0.0
- trace: postponed_configurations::add: create {foo | libfoo->{foo/1}}
+ trace: postponed_configurations::add: create {foo | libfoo->{foo/1,1}}
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: postpone foo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin fix/1.0.0
%.*
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cannot cfg-postpone dependency foo/1.0.0 of dependent fix/1.0.0 (collected prematurely), checking for configuration cycle
- trace: postponed_configurations::add: create {fix | foo->{fix/1}}
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: no configuration cycle, throwing
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cannot cfg-postpone dependency foo/1.0.0 of dependent fix/1.0.0 (collected prematurely), throwing postpone_dependency
trace: pkg_build: collection failed due to prematurely collected dependency (foo), retry from scratch
%.*
trace: pkg_build: refine package collection/plan execution from scratch
@@ -5123,7 +5187,7 @@ test.options += --no-progress
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin fix/1.0.0
%.*
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency foo/1.0.0 of dependent fix/1.0.0
- trace: postponed_configurations::add: create {fix | foo->{fix/1}}
+ trace: postponed_configurations::add: create {fix | foo->{fix/1,1}}
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: postpone fix/1.0.0
trace: pkg_build: erase bogus postponement libfoo
trace: pkg_build: bogus postponements erased, throwing
@@ -5136,7 +5200,7 @@ test.options += --no-progress
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin fux/1.0.0
%.*
trace: collect_build: add libfoo/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: recursively collect dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent fux/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: no cfg-clause for dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent fux/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin libfoo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end libfoo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end fux/1.0.0
@@ -5144,20 +5208,16 @@ test.options += --no-progress
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin fix/1.0.0
%.*
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency foo/1.0.0 of dependent fix/1.0.0
- trace: postponed_configurations::add: create {fix | foo->{fix/1}}
+ trace: postponed_configurations::add: create {fix | foo->{fix/1,1}}
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: postpone fix/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_postponed (0): begin
trace: collect_build_postponed (1): begin
%.*
- trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate begin {fix | foo->{fix/1}}
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate begin {fix | foo->{fix/1,1}}
trace: collect_build_postponed (1): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependencies
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin foo/1.0.0
%.*
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cannot cfg-postpone dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent foo/1.0.0 (collected prematurely), checking for configuration cycle
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: being negotiated: {fix | foo->{fix/1}}
- trace: postponed_configurations::add: create {foo | libfoo->{foo/1}}
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: verifying {fix | foo->{fix/1}}
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: no configuration cycle, throwing
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cannot cfg-postpone dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent foo/1.0.0 (collected prematurely), throwing postpone_dependency
trace: pkg_build: collection failed due to prematurely collected dependency (libfoo), retry from scratch
%.*
trace: pkg_build: refine package collection/plan execution from scratch
@@ -5173,13 +5233,11 @@ test.options += --no-progress
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin foo/1.0.0
%.*
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent foo/1.0.0
- trace: postponed_configurations::add: create {foo | libfoo->{foo/1}}
+ trace: postponed_configurations::add: create {foo | libfoo->{foo/1,1}}
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: postpone foo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin fix/1.0.0
%.*
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cannot cfg-postpone dependency foo/1.0.0 of dependent fix/1.0.0 (collected prematurely), checking for configuration cycle
- trace: postponed_configurations::add: create {fix | foo->{fix/1}}
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: no configuration cycle, throwing
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cannot cfg-postpone dependency foo/1.0.0 of dependent fix/1.0.0 (collected prematurely), throwing postpone_dependency
trace: pkg_build: collection failed due to prematurely collected dependency (foo), retry from scratch
%.*
trace: pkg_build: refine package collection/plan execution from scratch
@@ -5196,43 +5254,43 @@ test.options += --no-progress
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin fix/1.0.0
%.*
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency foo/1.0.0 of dependent fix/1.0.0
- trace: postponed_configurations::add: create {fix | foo->{fix/1}}
+ trace: postponed_configurations::add: create {fix | foo->{fix/1,1}}
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: postpone fix/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_postponed (0): begin
trace: collect_build_postponed (1): begin
%.*
- trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate begin {fix | foo->{fix/1}}
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate begin {fix | foo->{fix/1,1}}
trace: collect_build_postponed (1): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependencies
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin foo/1.0.0
%.*
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent foo/1.0.0
- trace: postponed_configurations::add: create {foo | libfoo->{foo/1}}
+ trace: postponed_configurations::add: create {foo | libfoo->{foo/1,1}}
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: postpone foo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_postponed (1): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependents
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: resume fix/1.0.0
%.*
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: skip cfg-negotiated dependency foo/1.0.0 of dependent fix/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: skip being cfg-negotiated dependency foo/1.0.0 of dependent fix/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end fix/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate end {fix | foo->{fix/1}}
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate end {fix | foo->{fix/1,1}}!
trace: collect_build_postponed (2): begin
%.*
- trace: collect_build_postponed (2): cfg-negotiate begin {foo | libfoo->{foo/1}}
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (2): cfg-negotiate begin {foo | libfoo->{foo/1,1}}
trace: collect_build_postponed (2): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependencies
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin libfoo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end libfoo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_postponed (2): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependents
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: resume foo/1.0.0
%.*
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: skip cfg-negotiated dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent foo/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: skip being cfg-negotiated dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent foo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end foo/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_postponed (2): cfg-negotiate end {foo | libfoo->{foo/1}}
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (2): cfg-negotiate end {foo | libfoo->{foo/1,1}}!
trace: collect_build_postponed (2): end
trace: collect_build_postponed (1): end
trace: collect_build_postponed (0): end
trace: execute_plan: simulate: yes
%.*
EOE
-
+#\
$pkg_status -r >>EOO;
!fux configured 1.0.0
libfoo configured 1.0.0
@@ -5249,6 +5307,7 @@ test.options += --no-progress
: existing
:
+ if false
{
+$clone_cfg
@@ -5495,6 +5554,7 @@ test.options += --no-progress
: postponed-collection
:
+ if false
{
+$clone_cfg
@@ -5503,11 +5563,9 @@ test.options += --no-progress
{
$clone_cfg;
- $* foo bar box 2>!;
-#\
$* foo bar box 2>>~%EOE%;
%.*
- trace: pkg_build: refine execution plan from scratch
+ trace: pkg_build: refine package collection/plan execution from scratch
%.*
trace: collect_build: add foo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build: add bar/1.0.0
@@ -5516,13 +5574,13 @@ test.options += --no-progress
%.*
trace: collect_build: add libfoo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent foo/1.0.0
- trace: postponed_configurations::add: create {foo | libfoo}
+ trace: postponed_configurations::add: create {foo | libfoo->{foo/1,1}}
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: postpone foo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin bar/1.0.0
%.*
trace: collect_build: add libbar/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency libbar/1.0.0 of dependent bar/1.0.0
- trace: postponed_configurations::add: create {bar | libbar}
+ trace: postponed_configurations::add: create {bar | libbar->{bar/1,1}}
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: postpone bar/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin box/1.0.0
%.*
@@ -5538,101 +5596,76 @@ test.options += --no-progress
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: postpone box/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_postponed (0): begin
trace: collect_build_postponed (1): begin
- trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate begin {foo | libfoo}
+ %.*
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate begin {foo | libfoo->{foo/1,1}}
trace: collect_build_postponed (1): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependencies
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin libfoo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end libfoo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_postponed (1): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependents
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: resume foo/1.0.0
%.*
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: skip cfg-negotiated dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent foo/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: skip being cfg-negotiated dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent foo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end foo/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate end {foo | libfoo}
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate end {foo | libfoo->{foo/1,1}}!
trace: collect_build_postponed (2): begin
- trace: collect_build_postponed (2): cfg-negotiate begin {bar | libbar}
+ %.*
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (2): cfg-negotiate begin {bar | libbar->{bar/1,1}}
trace: collect_build_postponed (2): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependencies
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin libbar/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end libbar/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_postponed (2): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependents
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: resume bar/1.0.0
%.*
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: skip cfg-negotiated dependency libbar/1.0.0 of dependent bar/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: skip being cfg-negotiated dependency libbar/1.0.0 of dependent bar/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end bar/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_postponed (2): cfg-negotiate end {bar | libbar}
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (2): cfg-negotiate end {bar | libbar->{bar/1,1}}!
trace: collect_build_postponed (2): index 1 collect alt-postponed box/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: resume box/1.0.0
%.*
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cannot cfg-postpone dependency libbar/1.0.0 of dependent box/1.0.0 (collected prematurely)
- trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiation of {bar | libbar} failed due to dependency libbar, try next
- trace: collect_build_postponed (1): index 1 collect alt-postponed box/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: resume box/1.0.0
- %.*
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency libbar/1.0.0 of dependent box/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cannot cfg-postpone dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent box/1.0.0 (collected prematurely)
- trace: collect_build_postponed (0): cfg-negotiation of {foo | libfoo} failed due to dependency libfoo, try next
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent box/1.0.0
+ trace: postponed_configurations::add: add {box | libbar->{box/1,1} libfoo->{box/1,1}} to {foo | libfoo->{foo/1,1}}!
+ trace: postponed_configurations::add: merge {bar | libbar->{bar/1,1}}! into {box foo | libbar->{box/1,1} libfoo->{box/1,1 foo/1,1}}!
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postponing dependent box/1.0.0 involves negotiated configurations and results in {bar box foo | libbar->{bar/1,1 box/1,1} libfoo->{box/1,1 foo/1,1}}!, throwing retry_configuration
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (0): cfg-negotiation of {foo | libfoo->{foo/1,1}} failed due to dependent box, adding shadow dependent and re-negotiating
trace: collect_build_postponed (1): begin
- trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate begin {bar | libbar}
- trace: collect_build_postponed (1): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependencies
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin libbar/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end libbar/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_postponed (1): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependents
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: resume bar/1.0.0
%.*
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: skip cfg-negotiated dependency libbar/1.0.0 of dependent bar/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end bar/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate end {bar | libbar}
- trace: collect_build_postponed (2): begin
- trace: collect_build_postponed (2): cfg-negotiate begin {foo | libfoo}
- trace: collect_build_postponed (2): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependencies
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate begin {foo | libfoo->{foo/1,1}}
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependencies
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin libfoo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end libfoo/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_postponed (2): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependents
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependents
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: resume foo/1.0.0
%.*
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: skip cfg-negotiated dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent foo/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: skip being cfg-negotiated dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent foo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end foo/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_postponed (2): cfg-negotiate end {foo | libfoo}
- trace: collect_build_postponed (2): index 1 collect alt-postponed box/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: resume box/1.0.0
- %.*
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cannot cfg-postpone dependency libbar/1.0.0 of dependent box/1.0.0 (collected prematurely)
- trace: collect_build_postponed (0): cfg-negotiation of {bar | libbar} failed due to dependency libbar, try next
- trace: collect_build_postponed (0): index 1 collect alt-postponed box/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: resume box/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate end {foo | libfoo->{foo/1,1}}!
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (2): begin
%.*
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency libbar/1.0.0 of dependent box/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent box/1.0.0
- trace: postponed_configurations::add: add {box | libbar, libfoo} to {foo | libfoo}
- trace: postponed_configurations::add: merge {bar | libbar} into {box, foo | libbar, libfoo}
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: postpone box/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_postponed (1): begin
- trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate begin {bar, box, foo | libbar, libfoo}
- trace: collect_build_postponed (1): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependencies
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (2): cfg-negotiate begin {bar | libbar->{bar/1,1}}
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (2): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependencies
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin libbar/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end libbar/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin libfoo/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end libfoo/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_postponed (1): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependents
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (2): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependents
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: resume bar/1.0.0
%.*
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: skip cfg-negotiated dependency libbar/1.0.0 of dependent bar/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: skip being cfg-negotiated dependency libbar/1.0.0 of dependent bar/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end bar/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (2): cfg-negotiate end {bar | libbar->{bar/1,1}}!
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (2): index 1 collect alt-postponed box/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: resume box/1.0.0
%.*
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: skip cfg-negotiated dependency libbar/1.0.0 of dependent box/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: skip cfg-negotiated dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent box/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency libbar/1.0.0 of dependent box/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent box/1.0.0
+ trace: postponed_configurations::add: add {box | libbar->{box/1,1} libfoo->{box/1,1}} to {foo | libfoo->{foo/1,1}}!
+ trace: postponed_configurations::add: merge {bar | libbar->{bar/1,1}}! into {box foo | libbar->{box/1,1} libfoo->{box/1,1 foo/1,1}}!
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end box/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: resume foo/1.0.0
- %.*
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: skip cfg-negotiated dependency libfoo/1.0.0 of dependent foo/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end foo/1.0.0
- trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate end {bar, box, foo | libbar, libfoo}
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (2): end
trace: collect_build_postponed (1): end
trace: collect_build_postponed (0): end
trace: execute_plan: simulate: yes
%.*
EOE
-#\
$pkg_status -r >>EOO;
!foo configured 1.0.0
@@ -5955,7 +5988,65 @@ test.options += --no-progress
{
$clone_cfg;
- $* bix 2>!;
+ $* bix 2>>~%EOE%;
+ %.*
+ trace: pkg_build: refine package collection/plan execution from scratch
+ %.*
+ trace: collect_build: add bix/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin bix/1.0.0
+ %.*
+ trace: collect_build: add libbar/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency libbar/1.0.0 of dependent bix/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build: add bar/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency bar/1.0.0 of dependent bix/1.0.0
+ trace: postponed_configurations::add: create {bix | bar->{bix/1,1} libbar->{bix/1,1}}
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: postpone bix/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (0): begin
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): begin
+ %.*
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate begin {bix | bar->{bix/1,1} libbar->{bix/1,1}}
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependencies
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin bar/1.0.0
+ %.*
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency libbar/1.0.0 of dependent bar/1.0.0
+ trace: postponed_configurations::add: add {bar | libbar->{bar/1,1}} to {bix | bar->{bix/1,1} libbar->{bix/1,1}}?
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postponing dependent bar/1.0.0 involves negotiated configurations and results in {bar bix | bar->{bix/1,1} libbar->{bar/1,1 bix/1,1}}?, throwing retry_configuration
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (0): cfg-negotiation of {bix | bar->{bix/1,1} libbar->{bix/1,1}} failed due to dependent bar, adding shadow dependent and re-negotiating
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): begin
+ %.*
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate begin {bix | bar->{bix/1,1} libbar->{bix/1,1}}
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependencies
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin bar/1.0.0
+ %.*
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency libbar/1.0.0 of dependent bar/1.0.0
+ trace: postponed_configurations::add: add {bar | libbar->{bar/1,1}} to {bix | bar->{bix/1,1} libbar->{bix/1,1}}?
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: dependent bar/1.0.0 is a shadow dependent for {bar bix | bar->{bix/1,1} libbar->{bar/1,1 bix/1,1}}?
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postponing dependent bar/1.0.0 involves non-negotiated configurations and results in {bar bix | bar->{bix/1,1} libbar->{bar/1,1 bix/1,1}}?, throwing merge_configuration
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (0): cfg-negotiation of {bix | bar->{bix/1,1} libbar->{bix/1,1}} failed due to non-negotiated clusters, force-merging based on shadow cluster {bar bix | bar->{bix/1,1} libbar->{bar/1,1 bix/1,1}}?
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): begin
+ %.*
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate begin {bix | bar->{bix/1,1} libbar->{bix/1,1}}
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependencies
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin bar/1.0.0
+ %.*
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency libbar/1.0.0 of dependent bar/1.0.0
+ trace: postponed_configurations::add: add {bar | libbar->{bar/1,1}} to {bix | bar->{bix/1,1} libbar->{bix/1,1}}? (shadow)
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: dependent bar/1.0.0 is a shadow dependent for {bar bix | bar->{bix/1,1} libbar->{bar/1,1 bix/1,1}}?
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postponing dependent bar/1.0.0 involves non-negotiated configurations and results in {bar bix | bar->{bix/1,1} libbar->{bar/1,1 bix/1,1}}?, throwing merge_configuration
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (0): cfg-negotiation of {bix | bar->{bix/1,1} libbar->{bix/1,1}} failed due to non-negotiated clusters, force-merging based on shadow cluster {bar bix | bar->{bix/1,1} libbar->{bar/1,1 bix/1,1}}?
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): begin
+ %.*
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): cfg-negotiate begin {bix | bar->{bix/1,1} libbar->{bix/1,1}}
+ trace: collect_build_postponed (1): recursively collect cfg-negotiated dependencies
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin bar/1.0.0
+ %.*
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postpone dependency libbar/1.0.0 of dependent bar/1.0.0
+ trace: postponed_configurations::add: add {bar | libbar->{bar/1,1}} to {bix | bar->{bix/1,1} libbar->{bix/1,1}}? (shadow)
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: dependent bar/1.0.0 is a shadow dependent for {bar bix | bar->{bix/1,1} libbar->{bar/1,1 bix/1,1}}?
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: cfg-postponing dependent bar/1.0.0 involves non-negotiated configurations and results in {bar bix | bar->{bix/1,1} libbar->{bar/1,1 bix/1,1}}?, throwing merge_configuration
+ ...
+ EOE
+
#\
$* bix 2>>~%EOE%;
%.*
@@ -7080,6 +7171,7 @@ test.options += --no-progress
: cycle
:
+ if false
{
+$clone_cfg
@@ -11218,7 +11310,7 @@ else
%.*
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: begin foo/1.0.0
%.*
- trace: collect_build_prerequisites: recursively collect dependency libbaz/1.0.0 [t2/] of dependent foo/1.0.0
+ trace: collect_build_prerequisites: no cfg-clause for dependency libbaz/1.0.0 [t2/] of dependent foo/1.0.0
trace: collect_build_prerequisites: end foo/1.0.0
%.*
trace: execute_plan: simulate: yes